Posts in Category: clothing

fashion poll

This poll may ruf­fle a few feath­ers, but I saw a cou­ple of women at lunch today wear­ing anklets and it made me wonder…

what time is it?

I used to be really into watches. I sus­pect that along with the rise of the Black­Berry, and other smart­phones, my watch ‘thing’ kinda fell by the way­side. In spite of my wan­ing pur­chases and use of watches, I still appre­ci­ate nice watch design. A cou­ple of months ago, I spot­ted a Stein­hausen watch. If you’re not famil­iar with Stein­hausen, the com­pany makes the watches you usu­ally find in auto and mens’ mag­a­zines. The adds usu­ally tout a ridicu­lous high sug­gested retail price (I’m nor­mally think­ing, “Who the hell would pay $750 for this watch”). That high price is then given the oblig­a­tory bold, diag­o­nal, red slash treat­ment, with a new low-low, spe­cial offer price of $69. Now you’re think­ing, “This watch must be P.O.S. if it can be marked down nearly $700.” Ok, I digress.

Instead of spot­ting the watch near the back of Auto­mo­bile, between ads for Enzyte and rub­ber floor mats, I saw a deal pop up on 1SalelaDay.com (think of it as Big Lots meets the web). In spite of all the eye-rolling about the price cuts, this par­tic­u­lar watch, called the Impulse, intrigued me..

I found the design of the watch inter­est­ing, and for the ridicu­lously low price of $19.99 (a far cry from the $250 MSRP), I decided to order one. About 10 days, or so, after plac­ing the order, a lit­tle box con­tain­ing the Impulse landed on my porch. I was quite excited to give the Impulse a test run.

Uh oh!

Putting aside how weird it felt to put on a watch after years of not wear­ing one, I noticed some­thing with the design of the watch face that pre­sented what would turn out to be an irrec­on­cil­able prob­lem. Take a look at the image posted above. Can you tell the time? Of course, it’s about 7:03. Now…take a look at the pic­ture below and tell me if you can eas­ily detect the time.

Ummm. Let me see. It’s about… __:42?

Exactly! For some rea­son, Stein­hausen decided to advance the num­bers for the hours rather dra­mat­i­cally after half past. The hour between about __:35 and __:50 is pretty much anyone’s guess. Of course, we all have a gen­eral sense of what time it might be through­out the day, bu not so much so that I always know. In my book, a watch shouldn’t make you work to fig­ure out the one thing it’s made for — to dis­play time. Of course, the folks that designed this watch have a com­pletely dif­fer­ent view of their prod­uct. Check out the descrip­tion of the watch on Steinhausen’s website.

“Our unique rotary move­ment Impulse Quartz watch is unlike any­thing we’ve issued before. The hour and minute are eas­ily read­able. There’s no guess­ing the time from mov­ing hands or roman numer­als. It’s almost like a dig­i­tal watch only 1,000 times cooler!”

GTFOH!

Stein­hausen needs to stop it! Right now!

Fun­nily enough, aside from the whole telling time thing, the watch is actu­ally pretty nice. The build is solid, the bright red pops off of the deep black — both on the face and strap. The strap seems pretty durable. Nev­er­the­less, I still don’t want it.

It would be a shame to just let this watch sit in a drawer next. Of course, I could donate it, but I thought that it would be fun to give this watch away. Maybe you have a bet­ter sense of the indi­vid­ual hours of the day; or you just aren’t as put off by the 15–20 min­utes of mys­tery each hour. What­ever the reason…who doesn’t like a free­bie contest?

If you’d like to win this watch, here’s what you need to do.

        Leave the com­ment “Pick Me!” below. Only enter this once.
        Get five peo­ple to leave a comment
        Those five peo­ple must type your name some­where in their comment

The first per­son to have his/her name appear six, unique, times is the win­ner. It’s that easy!

I will mail the watch to the win­ner by USPS Pri­or­ity Mail. Good luck!

We have a win­ner.

Con­grat­u­la­tions Rod!

infographics: barefoot running

click on the info­graphic to enlarge

Source: RunningShoes.com

infographics: 50 mistakes (men’s clothing)

click the info­graphic to enlarge

Source: Com­plex

baby steps

Last fall, I posted a short piece about shoes, and how I was mor­ti­fied when I took an hon­est look at the con­di­tion of my shoes. I din’t men­tion that I also worked with a guy, Rod, who always had his shoe game together — nice shoes with a good pol­ish. Well, since that time, I have been slowly sift­ing through my shoe col­lec­tion. I now have a laun­dry bas­ket full of shoes I no longer like. From them, any unde­sir­able shoes that are not sig­nif­i­cantly worn will be donated to char­ity. The rest will be pitched. I fig­ured the only way to stop wear­ing busted shoes is to not own them. To that end, I used the occa­sion of ini­ti­at­ing Oper­a­tion Twenty12 as an oppor­tu­nity to pick up a new pair of shoes. They are pair of plain black Soho Oxford shoes by Robert Wayne. I spot­ted them at DSW about a month ago, but didn’t pur­chase them. Sub­se­quently, I haven’t been able to find the shoe at two dif­fer­ent DSW loca­tions. I rolled the dice yes­ter­day and went to the DSW at Wheaton Mall (Mary­land) and was dis­heart­ened to dis­cover the shoes were not dis­played. On a whim, I went to the clear­ance rack. (Well…that’s really not a whim, because I usu­ally start at the clear­ance rack at DSW (or any store for that mat­ter) and work my way back to the main area of the store.) Voila! There were my shoes. There were actu­ally two pairs of them. I debated whether I should just get both so that I could alter­nate and not wear one pair down. I decided not to get the sec­ond pair at the time, but I will likely go back today to pick them up. (Fin­gers crossed, hop­ing they’re still there.) It doesn’t hurt that the shoes are marked down from the DSW-discount price of $80 to $54. Both prices are well below the sug­gested retail of $119.

So, thus I make my start with the cloth­ing sec­tion of my project. It’s a baby step (pun intended), but it’s a step. Here are a few pic­tures of the shoes, jux­ta­posed with the shoes I was wear­ing yes­ter­day. Iron­i­cally, the shoes I had on yes­ter­day are the shoes that I ref­er­enced in my post in Octo­ber. Those old shoes are just sad. Busi­ness casual shouldn’t be an excuse for wear­ing busted gear.