Posts Tagged: mobile phones

2012 : one year — seven phones

To know me, is to know how much I love tech­nol­ogy. I have been a sucker for elec­tron­ics ever since I was a kid, loi­ter­ing for hours in the stereo sec­tion High­land Appli­ance store on South West­nedge in Portage, MI, or in Shack Elec­tron­ics in down­town Kala­ma­zoo. I will skip over the part about tak­ing apart tele­vi­sions and try­ing to rebuild them. That didn’t work out so well. I dis­cov­ered that I am a much bet­ter con­nois­seur than tech­ni­cian. As com­put­ers evolved, I fell in love with them, too. Again, my focus was equally, if not more, on the design, fit & fin­ish, mate­ri­als, and build qual­ity, than what the device could actu­ally do when you hit the power but­ton. I loved Marantz and Denon receivers because they looked just as good as they per­formed. Aes­thet­ics are important.

Per­haps I am say­ing all this to pro­vide some con­text, or lay a back story, for the the changes I expe­ri­ence with my mobile phone in 2012.

Phone #1

I entered 2012 with the tank-like, and fre­quently glitchy, Motorola Droid X.

droidx

As I men­tioned above, I am inter­ested in tech­nol­ogy, and even learn­ing how things work. I am not, how­ever, all that inter­ested in get­ting my full geek on and learn­ing pro­gram­ming code. Most Android phones are “rootable,” mean­ing that you can fid­dle with the code and install var­i­ous oper­at­ing sys­tems (ROMs). If you have the time and patience, you can cre­ate a highly cus­tomized device that suits your needs. As com­pelling as the end result may be, I am just not that dude. I feel like mak­ing a com­pelling user expe­ri­ence should fall on the hands of the man­u­fac­turer. My only “job” should be to learn about all of the var­i­ous fea­tures, and take good care of the device. This is one area where I dif­fer greatly with most Android enthusiasts.

Mov­ing on.

After suf­fer­ing through a num­ber of prob­lems with the Droid X, the device received a not-so-accidental beat down from a quartz countertop.

androidicide01

Phone #2

I thought that it might have been time to take a break from smart­phones, so I thought about try­ing an old, but slim, LG flip phone that I had in my house.

lg8700

That non-data exper­i­ment only lasted a cou­ple of days.

Phone #3

I was not quite sure that I was going to do about a “new” phone, but know­ing that I wanted access to email, at least, I decided to acti­vate my wife’s old Black­Berry 8830.

blackberry8830

I could only stand using that Black­Berry for an evening.

Phone #4

I jumped on Craigslist and found some­one sell­ing a very clean Droid Incred­i­ble for $90. Some­how, I was back where I started with smart­phones. The Droid Incred­i­ble was my first, non-work smartphone.

droidincredible

Inter­est­ingly, after using the bulky Droid X for nearly 18 months, the Droid Incred­i­ble seems small. Con­sid­er­ing that I don’t like stuff in my pock­ets, this is not a bad thing.

Phone #5

As much as I liked the small foot­print (or pocket print — get your mind out of the gut­ter), I missed the larger 4.3″ screen of the Droid X. (The Droid Incredible’s screen is 3.7″) I went on Craigslist and eBay, and even­tu­ally came across some­one sell­ing a Droid Incred­i­ble 2.

droidincredible2

Though it looks nearly iden­ti­cal to the orig­i­nal Incred­i­ble, the Droid Incred­i­ble 2 has a 4″ screen and a front-facing cam­era. This change was purely incre­men­tal, and I knew that the Incred­i­ble 2 would the last used device that I would pick up before decid­ing on what would be my next major smart­phone upgrade.

This is where my quandary began. I have been using Android devices for three full years, and I was fully pre­pared to stay in the Android ecosys­tem. For as lit­tle as I am drawn to the nerdy, tin­ker­ing side of Android, I appre­ci­ate the many things that oper­at­ing sys­tem offers. Even with out root­ing, Android devices are highly cus­tomiz­able, allow­ing users to make devices uniquely their own. Con­trary to what some peo­ple (iPhone users that have never touched an Android device) may say, cus­tomiz­ing an Android device is not rocket science.

Even with three years invested on Android, I was always open to mov­ing to another device. I was par­tic­u­larly inter­ested in the release of the iPhone 5. There was spec­u­la­tion that the phys­i­cal shape would change a bit, and Apple is one of the best when it comes to design of con­sumer elec­tron­ics and com­put­ers. When the veil was finally lifted on the iPhone 5, I was under­whelmed.

Not really wowed by Apple, I turned my sights back to Android — with a slight side-eye on Win­dows Phone 8. Rumors has been fly­ing around all sum­mer about a new Nexus (Google’s des­ig­nated flag­ship device). The release was expected in the fall, and sure enough the Nexus 4 was announced. It is made by LG (chor­tle). It has glass on the front and the back (sound famil­iar?). It lacked 4G/LTE. Screeeeeeeeeeeeeech!

To refresh a dying expres­sion — Oh…hell to the nah!

Feel­ing let down by Google and the Nexus 4, I thought about get­ting a Sam­sung Galaxy SIII. My wife has one, and has been pretty happy. How­ever, I read some rumors about a new phone by HTC that was headed to Ver­i­zon. I was to be called the Droid DNA. After quite a bit of hand-wringing, and talk­ing to my friend Francis…

Phone #6

droiddna

This phone is pretty amaz­ing. It has a 5″ screen, with an insade 1080p res­o­lu­tion. Think of hav­ing an HD, 1080p flat-screen tele­vi­sion in your pocket. The screen is amaz­ing. Sur­pris­ingly, the Droid DNA is quite light for its size. It has a fast proces­sor, 4G/LTE, a great cam­era, and is run­ning the lat­est (well…sorta) ver­sion of Android. There was a lot of con­cern about the phone not hav­ing great bat­tery life, but in two weeks, I never had a prob­lem mak­ing it through an entire day on a charge. Note: It has induc­tive wire­less charg­ing capa­bil­ity built in, so if you have a Qi charg­ing mat, all you have to do is set the phone down on the mat and boom, it’s charg­ing. Pretty cool stuff.

Of course, if you remem­ber the title of the post, you know that there is one more device to go. So you’re likely won­der­ing what was wrong with the DNA. It is a sim­ple as this — it was just too big (dimen­sions). Again, the phone is incred­i­bly light and quite sleek. I just found that the dimen­sions of the phone didn’t work with the way that I nor­mally carry my phone, and that is in my front pocket. I don’t like hav­ing any­thing bulky in my pock­ets, so I have a super thin wal­let, and I want a phone that I don’t really feel. As much as I loved the Droid DNA, it just didn’t fit with my phys­i­cal needs/requirements. Let me just add this…if you take or view a lot of pic­tures, watch videos or movies, or need to read eas­ily on your smart­phone, you really can’t do bet­ter than the Droid DNA. The only hitch is that you have to be com­fort­able with a tall phone. It’s quite thin and very light, but just know going in that it will take up your entire pocket.

Just as my two weeks exchange period was com­ing to an end, I walked into the Ver­i­zon store with the Droid DNA neatly repack­aged. Was this my change to try another oper­at­ing sys­tem? HTC also make a Win­dows Phone 8 device for Ver­i­zon. The oper­at­ing sys­tem is a bit of a dark horse, but it looks inter­est­ing. Nope.

Phone #7

Lucky phone num­ber seven is a device that I had no inten­tion of buy­ing just a few months prior.

iphone5black

You know, I was going to title this post “I finally gave in,” but that wouldn’t be accu­rate. I have been using Android devices for three full years and I don’t see the iPhone or iOS oper­at­ing sys­tem as supe­rior to the Android oper­at­ing sys­tem and some Android devices. My thought of “giv­ing in” was resist­ing the idea of pick­ing up an iPhone because so many user are com­pletely biased and inca­pable of objec­tiv­ity. I didn’t, and still don’t, want to become “one of them!” Fun­nily enough, I had the same resis­tance before buy­ing two Apple com­put­ers. My wife help me com­pletely the com­plete Apple ring of fire by giv­ing me an iPad for Christ­mas. Am I becom­ing hap­pily encamped or naïvely enslaved? That remains to be seen. After nearly a month with the iPhone 5, here’s my experience.

The iPhone 5 is beau­ti­fully crafted. The design is not rev­o­lu­tion­ary, as Apple is prone to say­ing, but it is clean and indus­trial. I love min­i­mal­ist design, so the iPhone 5 is right on the money for my taste. For years, I have been nau­se­ated by the Apple mantra “It just works.” I actu­ally think that notion is bull­shit, because if you haven’t used an Apple com­puter or phone before, you won’t be able to pick it up and become a mas­ter. It takes time and prac­tice. I think the only rea­son so many peo­ple know how to use iPhones and IPads is because every com­mer­cial you see for them is a tuto­r­ial. Android is crit­i­cized, and some­times right­fully so, for hav­ing too many con­trols and options buried in menus. Since using the iPHone, com­ing from Android, I have been no less con­fused, ini­tially, about how to per­form cer­tain func­tions. Add to that, I find that Apple’s on-screen but­tons take up pre­cious screen real estate, while Android devices save that space for the apps. It is really a mat­ter of pref­er­ence. I don’t think one is inher­ently bet­ter than the other. How­ever, if you’re switch­ing to the iPhone from an Android device, there is def­i­nitely a learn­ing curve.

One thing that I absolutely love about the iPhone is how it works with just about every­thing else. Devices sync quite eas­ily with the iPhone. Android devices didn’t have a prob­lem sync­ing, nec­es­sar­ily, but it is clear that the bulk of third-party devices, includ­ing audio sys­tems in cars, were designed to play nice with the iPhone. Here’s an exam­ple. When I had phones 1, 4, 5 & 6, I could stream music to my wife’s Blue­tooth audio sys­tem in her car. When I synced the iPhone 5 to the car, all the track infor­ma­tion shows up on the screen. This may seem minor, but I really appre­ci­ate these lit­tle things.

Aside from the dif­fer­ence in the num­ber of apps avail­able for iPhones ver­sus Android devices, there are sub­tle dif­fer­ences in the apps on either oper­at­ing sys­tem. The dif­fer­ences ben­e­fit iPhone. It is pretty clear that devel­op­ers design apps for iPhones and iPads first, and then port them over to Android, if at all. Again, the dif­fer­ences are often minor aes­thet­ics, but it’s enough to notice and alter one’s experience.

A few quib­bles. I hope Apple changes about the oper­at­ing sys­tem include a bet­ter noti­fi­ca­tion panel. Android has this func­tion nailed, and it keeps get­ting bet­ter. Apple is clearly the novice in this arena. If any­thing, it would be nice to have some quick tog­gles for sounds, wifi, and blue­tooth. I also like that I could swipe the noti­fi­ca­tion panel down in the lock screen on Android. It pro­vides a quick way to check noti­fi­ca­tions with­out hav­ing to have the badges on the screen. Another thing that I hope gets improved in the next release of iOS is the shar­ing options. Cur­rently, Apple has the ecosys­tem so locked down that you can’t share things on your phone (pic­tures, web pages, etc) with apps of your chos­ing. This is wide open on Android, and cre­ates a much bet­ter shar­ing and pro­duc­tiv­ity expe­ri­ence. For instance. if I’m look­ing at some­thing on the browser on an Android device, I can long press on the URL and the option to share the link with apps pops up. From there, I have a laun­dry list of apps to send this link, includ­ing Spring­pad or Ever­note. You can­not do that on the iPhone with­out copy­ing the link, going to the other app and past­ing. That’s not an exam­ple of “It just works!” to me. One thing about the pack­ag­ing for the phone that just makes no sense to me are the white cords with a black device. I sup­pose it’s a brand recog­ni­tion issue, but I don’t want a white charge cable and ear­phones with a black phone.

So, there you have it. My odyssey with smart­phones in 2012. In spite of my reluc­tance to go all Apple, I’m in — for the time being. Google and Motorola are rumored to be work­ing on a really nice Android device that will be released some­time this year. I’ll stick with the iPhone for my two-year con­tract, and hope that Apple improves iOS. If not, I will have no reser­va­tions to mov­ing back to Android. For me, it’s more about usabil­ity than visibility.

a surprising realization

Dis­claimer: This post is writ­ten purely from the per­spec­tive of a self-professed nerd that fol­lows tech­nol­ogy rather closely.

 

There are just too many smart­phones hit­ting the mar­ket — specif­i­cally Android devices.

I know that the cur­rent trend in mobile devices is a move from basic fea­ture phones to smart­phones. I sus­pect that trend is respon­si­ble for the mar­ket being flooded with afford­able smart­phones. I know…I know. There needs to be smart­phones to fit every budget.

My prob­lem is not so much that there are so-called “entry level” or “mid-range” smart­phones. (Though this range of devices does cre­ate an issue of over­all improvement/advancement of the Android oper­at­ing sys­tem.) My issue is that there are so many of these devices that they nearly indis­cern­able. This issue, how­ever, is not lim­ited to afford­able smart­phones. A good deal of annoy­ance with the glut of Android devices comes in the high-end seg­ment of the smart­phone mar­ket. As some­one who fol­lows tech pretty closely, I can tell you that a high-end smart­phone seems to be released just about every two or three weeks. Given that iPhones are only released on an annual basis, I’m clearly talk­ing about Android devices. Each new iter­a­tion is only slightly dif­fer­ent than the lat­est and great­est released just weeks prior.

As I thought about this sit­u­a­tion, I was reminded of a funny scene from one of my favorite movies, Amadeus.


 
Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for inno­va­tion and push­ing the enve­lope. In some respects, it’s inter­est­ing to see what new fea­tures and capa­bil­i­ties can be added to smart­phone. I think the drive to “out tech” each other is dri­ving this fre­netic release sched­ule; but let’s not fool our­selves, the release sched­ule of the iPhone has a lot to do with this as well. With the antic­i­pated launch of the iPhone5 just a cou­ple of weeks away, man­u­fac­tur­ers of Android smart­phones, as well as Google itself (steam­ing ahead toward release of the “Ice Cream” oper­at­ing sys­tem update), are rac­ing to bring com­pelling prod­ucts to mar­ket to counter the iPhone lust. Microsoft is also in the mix with the Mango update to it’s Win­dows Phone 7 oper­at­ing system.

Rais­ing Microsoft’s name is rel­e­vant here. Not because the mar­ket is flooded with Win­dows Phone 7 devices. To the con­trary. What’s inter­est­ing is that Android has seem­ingly taken the place of the older ubiq­ui­tous Win­dows Phone. Before the cur­rent oper­at­ing sys­tem updated, Win­dows Phones fea­tured a decent oper­at­ing sys­tem, but did not drive inno­va­tion. Google’s Android is inno­vat­ing, for sure, but the sat­u­ra­tion of basic devices with older ver­sions of the oper­at­ing sys­tem have, in my opin­ion, led to the issues of frag­men­ta­tion and ambiva­lence by some devel­op­ers from cre­at­ing appli­ca­tions for the platform.

Ok. Instead of just post­ing a rant, here are a cou­ple ideas on how to change, or improve, this issue of smart­phone saturation.

  • Google/Android need to set min­i­mum require­ments for proces­sor speeds and inter­nal mem­ory. My son’s Ti-89 cal­cu­la­tor has more com­put­ing power than a lot of the crappy smart­phones on the mar­ket. Microsoft took this approach with Win­dows Phone 7. This doesn’t mean that every phone will be great, but at least even the cheap­est vari­ent on the plat­form is capa­ble of per­form­ing the same tasks as a more expen­sive device with more bells and whistles.
  • Car­ri­ers should real­ize that more is not always more. Hav­ing a store stocked with a plethora of marginally-performing smart­phones doesn’t make you the nation’s best wire­less com­pany. It just means you have a bunch of shitty phones. The pay-as-you go car­ri­ers, many owned by the large car­ri­ers, need to get with the pro­gram, too.

Con­sumers have a role to play, too. In my opin­ion, hav­ing a smart­phone is a lux­ury. If peo­ple are will­ing to drop $25+ for a data pack­age, on top of the under­ly­ing min­utes plan, they should at least be will­ing to drop more than 40 bucks for the phone. Stop being cheap! I hear a lot of “Well, that’s more phone phone that I need.” Why even get a smart­phone, then? Just get a fea­ture phone with mes­sag­ing. Addi­tion­ally, far too many of us have come to accept the ter­ri­ble bat­tery life asso­ci­ated with these phones. I have yet to meet any­one with a smart­phone, other than a Black­Berry … and I won’t even get into that … that can get more than a day from their phone. With the intro­duc­tion of 4G phones, bat­tery life is taken an even greater hit.

Note: I have been sit­ting on this post for a while — Sept. 26. In the time since my draft, Motorola intro­duced the Bionic, only to outdo itself by intro­duc­ing the Razr, which is, essen­tially, the same device — just thin­ner. Mean­while, Apple lifted the veil on the iPhone 4S. Though many were dis­ap­pointed, includ­ing me, that there was not a new form fac­tor; Apple focused on mak­ing an industry-leading device bet­ter. The final nudge to hit pub­lish on this post was see­ing an arti­cle last night on the tech site Phone Dog.

What do you think? Are there too many phones avail­able, or do you like hav­ing a lot of choices?

good gets better

I have come to the real­iza­tion that I am the nerd amongst my set of friends. I shot out a sta­tus update last night on Twit­ter and Face­book ask­ing who else would be watch­ing the big Google/Samsung event. The resound­ing response, to quote my good friend Jeniene, was “**crick­ets.** I had to laugh. Nev­er­the­less, I sol­diered on, joined on GoogleTalk by my tech partner-in-crime, Fran­cis. In a nut­shell, last night Google rolled out it’s lat­est ver­sion of the Android Oper­at­ing Sys­tem, known as Ice Cream Sand­wich. In tan­dem with that announce­ment, Sam­sung revealed the not-so-secret Galaxy Nexus. The Galaxy Nexus, though a bit larger, looks like a beau­ti­ful piece of hard­ware. The focus, how­ever, really was on the improve­ments to the oper­at­ing sys­tem. I titled this piece “Good Gets Bet­ter” because I feel that Android, at this point, is good, but needs improve­ment. What I saw in the pre­sen­ta­tion last night has thor­oughly intrigued me, and may just keep me from a pos­si­ble move to the iPhone. Though I am prone to, some­times exhaus­tive, long-form posts, I’ll let the folks at Google explain the what’s new.

If you really want to get your hands dirty, and get an insider’s per­spec­tive on the direc­tion Google is tak­ing Android, check out this great inter­view of Matias Duarte by Joshua Topol­sky for This Is My Next (soon to be The Verge).

Of course, I would be remiss if I didn’t give a nod to Apple’s pre­sen­ta­tion of the improved, though not entirely new, iPhone 4S

Kudos to Apple. They truly know how to do a slick presentation.

On an aside, I won­der if Apple’s peo­ple know that their keynotes would be just as suc­cess­ful with­out so many superla­tives. Apple is quite fond of the word “amazing!”

I, along with many oth­ers, was dis­ap­pointed that a com­pletely new iPhone 5 was not intro­duced. All the rumors and spec­u­la­tion about a new body had me going. It should be noted that my friend Brian nailed nearly every fea­ture of the iPhone 4S sev­eral weeks before the announce­ment. Irre­spec­tive of my let down over a new shiny body, the iPhone form fac­tor is still very attrac­tive. There are a num­ber of inter­est­ing enhance­ments com­ing with iOS 5 that really don’t have any­thing to do with the new 4S itself, but if I were going to move to the iPhone, I would get the 4S over the 4. The improve­ments to the cam­era, which was already a solid per­former, look really impres­sive. Sev­eral of my friends who are pho­tog­ra­phers have been rav­ing about the cam­era. For what it’s worth, Siri, the per­sonal assis­tant soft­ware, is cute but not some­thing that blows me away. In all can­dor, all the post-announcement blather and gig­gles about how “neat” Siri is causes a slight amount of gas­tric juice to bub­ble up into my mouth. Look..I have a sense of humor, but come on!

The iPhone 4S has risen near the top of the list, right behind the Galaxy Nesus, as a replace­ment for my Droid X. I haven’t given up on Win­dows Phone 7…yet. If only Nokia would release that beau­ti­ful N9 here in the States with the Win­dows Phone 7 oper­at­ing system.

i’m starting to love windows phone 7’s ui

I don’t know if is the inter­mit­tent bug­gi­ness of my Droid X, or just my inter­est in design, that led me to be much more open to all mobile oper­at­ing sys­tems. I’ve been tak­ing a look at the iPhone more now since it’s avail­able on Ver­i­zon. While no knock on iPhones, gen­er­ally, the UI feels a lit­tle stale to me. (Don’t get me wrong. At this point, sta­bil­ity of a plat­form is equally, if not more, impor­tant.) If you’ve read my blog for a while, you know that I have also had more than a pass­ing inter­est in Win­dows Phone 7. My inter­est started with a sim­ple desire to see com­pe­ti­tion in the mobile device mar­ket. Com­pe­ti­tion pushes all of the play­ers to be inno­v­a­tive, or, at the very least, per­fect an exist­ing prod­uct. Com­pe­ti­tion is great, but, in all hon­esty, it is the new Win­dows user inter­face that really piqued my inter­est. A few days ago, Engad­get posted the fol­low­ing video from Microsoft’s annual MIX devel­oper conference.

I am much more impressed with the user inter­face than I was just a few months ago. Maybe it’s the mix of my love for design and min­i­mal­ism, but the WP7 lay­out really appeals to me. Though not liked by all, I am a fan of the panoramic lay­out. I like the way devel­op­ers have designed apps to work within the WP7 oper­at­ing sys­tem. I also like the black back­ground with the clean light font on top. It all looks very clean, and some­thing that won’t look dated in a year or two. I have been very crit­i­cal of Microsoft’s slower than snails’ pace devel­op­ment of Win­dows Phone 7, but I think the com­pany deserves credit for com­pletely over­haul­ing the user expe­ri­ence on Windows-run mobile devices. It’s a dar­ing depar­ture from Win­dows Mobile as we knew it, and unlike any­thing else on the market.

I still have yet to know even one per­son with a Win­dows Phone 7 device. (Read, I don’t know any­one that I can beg to play with their phone.) I really don’t like try­ing devices in car­rier stores, because you can’t get a feel for how the phone really oper­ates in every­day sit­u­a­tions. I guess that will have to be the case, until I am rec­og­nized as a reviewer by the OEMs and am sent review devices. One can dream, right?

What is your take on Win­dows Phone 7? Inter­est­ing or irrelevant?

a [big] htc windows phone 7 coming this fall

The folks at TmoNews, a great site for news about prod­ucts on T-Mobile, are report­ing  that HTC will likely reveal the HD3, which will serve as a Win­dows Phone 7 upgrade from HD2 (run­ning Win­dows Mobile 6.5), at a press event next Wednes­day in Lon­don.  The expected launch date is Wednes­day, Novem­ber 17th.

Reported specs for HD3 include:

  • Win­dows Phone 7 oper­at­ing system
  • 4.5″ AMOLED screen (Appar­ently, HTC has resolved it’s screen sourc­ing issues.)
  • dual-core 1.5 GHz processor
  • GB of RAM
  • 32 GB of inter­nal stor­age (wow!)
  • 8 megapixel cam­era capa­ble of shoot­ing HD video (again, wow!)
  • 1800 mAh battery

If I had to guess, pric­ing on the HD3 will be around $249.

I orig­i­nally thought devices with screens over four inches would be too big for com­fort­able daily use–as a phone. After hav­ing some hands-on time with the EVO4G and own­ing the Droid X — both with a 4.3″ screens –  my think­ing has shifted. Though too big for some, the EVO4G and the Droid X are not as big as one might think, and are quite com­fort­able for every day use. I don’t think the .2″ increase on the HD3 will be too sig­nif­i­cant. Whereas the Dell Streak’s 5″ screen pushes it into tablet ter­ri­tory. We’ll see.